The numbers contradict each other
Analytics, ad accounts and the CRM report different values for the same event, and nobody has settled which one counts.
The audit names the cause behind each discrepancy instead of a general suspicion.
An analytics audit for websites, portals and campaigns
We assess the measurement plan, the technical tracking, consent and reporting within an agreed scope. You receive documented findings, clearly marked gaps in the assessment, and a prioritised backlog for engineering, editorial and campaigns.
An audit is worth doing when you have numbers, but none of them will carry a decision.
Analytics, ad accounts and the CRM report different values for the same event, and nobody has settled which one counts.
The audit names the cause behind each discrepancy instead of a general suspicion.
After a change to the banner, the categories or consent mode, the reach figures move without the connection being documented anywhere.
The effect of the consent situation becomes visible and describable.
Events fire, but they do not distinguish intentions, carry no context, or count the same action more than once.
Events turn into metrics you can prioritise with.
Without a documented starting point, you cannot later show whether a change had any effect.
A baseline is captured before the ground shifts.
Every finding names the location, the observation, the impact, the recommendation and the priority. The report is not tied to any one delivery partner.
We work with agreed read access and named sources. Anything we cannot reach is documented as a limit of the assessment. Our view does not replace legal advice.
The scope follows the question that needs answering — not the number of tools that happen to be installed.
Which decision is this number meant to support? We assess goal definitions, metrics, segments and how clearly they are separated from one another.
Tag delivery, events, parameters, duplicates, server-side and client-side collection, and the integration in Drupal and the tag manager.
Banner, categories, consent mode and their effect on how complete and comparable the data is. The legal assessment remains with your organisation.
Bot and test traffic, referrer exclusions, internal access, sampling, retention and known breaks in the time series.
Reports, dashboards and exports, assessed on whether they answer the question they are supposed to answer.
Campaign parameters, channel attribution, ad accounts, and how the entry point is carried through to the enquiry.
The starting point ranges from a single disputed metric to a full assessment.
For one clearly stated question, such as a conversion figure that does not add up or a break after a consent change.
You receive prioritised findings on the agreed question.
For a complete view of the measurement plan, the tracking, consent, data quality and reporting.
You receive the state of the assessment, a list of findings, a tracking plan and a backlog.
When a relaunch or a campaign is coming up and the effect should be provable afterwards.
A documented starting point is captured on top of the findings.
On access, consent, tools and what happens next.